MAINTENANCE OF HIGH TRAFFIC ROADS
USING SLURRY SURFACING

Glynn. Holleran (1.), Jeffrey .R . Reed (1), Irina. V. Motina (2).
1.Valley Slurry Seal Company
3050 Beacon Blvd West Sacramento 95691
California U.S.A.
2. Motina Consulting
24 International Street
Ryazan Russian Republic

Back to VSS Technology Papers Library


Abstract:

The successful use of slurry surfacing on high traffic roads, even in roads subject to extreme conditions of climate and /or studded tires, has been demonstrated in many projects. Such surfacing can provide a hard wearing and skid resistant surface for many years.

This paper examines the requirements of slurry surfacing mixtures for high traffic roads in terms of materials (aggregates, polymers and emulsions), design and application. Special emulsion requirements, and the concepts of controlled coalescence of binders to optimize cure times, are discussed. Laboratory results are presented which show the effects of ambient conditions of temperature, humidity and sunlight (i.e. night vs. day work) on mix performance, particularly cohesion build up and abrasion resistance.

Some case studies for busy roads are discussed including arterial city roads, Interstate freeways and highways. Roads in areas of very low winter temperature and roads with very high summer temperatures are included. Aspects of application and performance are presented which show the main problems and how to overcome them.

1. Introduction

Slurry surfacing is a cold applied mixture of aggregates and bitumen emulsion. It has basically two forms, slurry seal- a thin application of one stone thickness, and microsurfacing-which may be laid in thick sections of 2-3 stones thickness. The requirements for each type of system are discussed in the International Slurry Surfacing Association (ISSA) Guidelines for Slurry Seal and for Microsurfacing (1). Slurry surfacing is a very versatile, environmentally efficient and friendly (2) system and may be used for many types of maintenance surfacing. This includes surfacing to correct raveling, surface irregularities, rutting and provides a high skid resistance surface (3). In many areas, it may be used in high traffic situations to give long lasting surfaces with life times of 3-10 years. In some cases much longer lifetimes have been reported for State highways.

This paper discusses the requirements for long lasting applications in high traffic areas. Currently the following States in USA have used slurry surfacing on state highways and Interstates. For example, in 1996 Georgia DOT laid over 400,000 m 2 on interstates and freeways near Atlanta before the summer Olympics. Interstates that have successfully used slurry surfacing in several states are I-80, I-5,I-99, I-77, I-81, I-44.
  • California
  • Delaware
  • Georgia
  • Illinois
  • Kansas
  • Maine
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Missouri
  • New Hampshire
  • New York
  • North Dakota
  • Texas
  • Vermont
  • Wyoming
  • Montana
  • North Carolina
  • Virginia
  • Okalahoma

  • Many countries have also used slurry surfacing on high traffic roads, these include, Canada, Germany, Italy, France, UK, Australia, Russia China and others.

    2. Mix Design And Materials Requirements

    The mix design of slurry surfacing is carried out according to several methods; mostly these methods are a variation on ISSA methods. In the past, slurry seal has been used for high traffic roads but, in the last decade microsurfacing has mostly been used. The mix design approach was examined by Texas DOT in 1998 and is currently the subject of a larger national study in USA .

    The main criteria for thedesign of slurry surfacing for high traffic roads are:

    • Resistance to raveling in early life
    • Resistance to wear with time and aging and maintaining surface texture
    • Resistance to deformation under traffic (especially for rut filling)
    • Ability to be trafficked quickly

    These properties are dependent on the materials used and the ratios in which they are used . Also they depend greatly on application conditions and technique.

    2.1 Materials Requirements

    Aggregate must be hard, non-polishing and sound. General requirements of ISSA must be followed for high traffic roads .The following modifications are suggested. The aggregate must be hard and meet all hot mix requirements, and be as cubical as possible, with less than 10% flat stones, especially in the larger fractions. The physical properties are shown in table 1.

    Table 1 General Properties required of aggregate

    Test Method

    Property

    Suggested value

    ASTM D2419

    Sand Equivalent

    65 min

    ASTM C88

    Soundness

    15% max using Na2 SO4

    25% max using MgSO4

    ASTM C131

    Abrasion

    30% max

    The grading is very important and should be type III ISSA.

    Table 2 Grading For High Traffic Roads
    Sieve Size passing Tolerance stockpile +/-
    9.5mm
    100
    4.75mm
    70 – 90
    5%
    2.36mm
    45 – 70
    5%
    1.18 mm
    28 – 50
    5%
    600um
    19 – 34
    5%
    330um
    12 – 25
    4%
    150um
    7 – 18
    3%
    75um
    5 – 15
    2%

    The emulsion must be compatible with the aggregate used. Generally the emulsion selected is cationic and quick traffic with polymer modification. Polymer modification is about 3% of an SBR or natural latex in the emulsion. Latex should be co-milled to optimize particle sizing. Particle size is an important factor in the performance of slurry surfacing (4). The emulsion must be stable to handle and able to be mixed with aggregate. Generally mean particle size should be no greater than 3-5 microns. The requirements of the residual properties from forced fan recovery are shown in table 3.

    Table 3 Residual Binder properties</td>

    Test

    Suggested value

    Residue

    62% minimum

    Softening Point (ASTM D 36)

    57C minimum

    Penetration (ASTM D5)

    100 max

    Fraas Point

    -20C maximum

    The use of Dynamic shear Rheometer, direct tension and bending beam tests to characterize the binders for low and high temperature performance via a PG rating ,may serve as a guide.

    2.2 Mixture Requirements

    The mixture requirements are based on two important factors, adhesion and cohesion, and how they are changed by different application and climatic conditions. The basic test requirements are shown in table 4. The suggested values for high traffic roads are indicated. The main requirement is that testing be done under the likely conditions of humidity and temperature. Issues such as film forming rate and cohesion build up need attention too. Aspects of compaction can also be accounted for as well in sample preparation.

    Table 4 Mixture Test Requirements
    Test Type Suggested Value
    ISSA TB-139 Wet cohesion 30 min-12 kg-cm min at temperature of application
    60 min-20 kg-cm at temperature of application
    ISSA TB 109 LWT sand adhesion 538g/m 2 maximum
    ISSA TB 114 Wet Stripping Pass 90% minimum coating
    ISSA TB 100 Abrasion Loss 538 g/m2 max 1 hour soak (50g/ft2)
    807 g/m2 6 day soak (75g/ft2)
    ISSA TB147 Displacement after 100 cycles LWT 5% maximum
    ISSA TB113 Mix time 120s minimum at mix conditions

    2.3 Test Results

    The effect of conditions on coalescence and film formation in high performance mixtures are shown in figures 1 and 2. These show cohesion build up effects under different conditions and the effect on abrasion resistance.


    Figure 1 Effect of Curing Conditions on Mixtures
    10C/High Humidity and Lab Humidity
    25C/High Humidity and Lab Humidity
    40C/High Humidity

    This figure shows clearly that high humidity and low temperature affect the cohesion build up and so the early mix performance.

    Indications of performance in both early life and long term performance can be found using this test. The sample treatment conditions are indicated below.

    A = Curing at 25C for 16 hours and 1 hour soak.
    B = Curing at 25C for 16 hours and 6 day soak.
    C = Curing at 60C for 16 hours and 1 hour soak.
    D = Curing at 60C for 16 hours and 6 day soak.
    E= Curing at 40C 16 hours High Humidity 1 hour soak
    F= Curing at 10C High Humidity 16 hours 1 hour soak
    G= Curing at 10C Lab Humidity 16 Hours 1 hour soak


    Figure 2 Abrasion loss data

    3. Case Studies

    3.1 Average Life:

    The following data were collected from DOT and other sources on life times of slurry surfacing on high traffic roads. As the case studies indicate they can be much higher.

    Table 5 Expected Lifetimes on heavy traffic roads
    Traffic

    Climate (ambient temps)

    Expected Life (years)

    10-20,000 VPD

    + 30C to –20C

    0C-40C

    20-50C

    5-7

    7-10

    5-7

    20,000-50,000 VPD

    + 30C to –20C

    0C-40C

    20-50C

    3-5

    5-7

    5-7

    50,000-100,000VPD

    + 30C to –20C

    0C-40C

    20-50C

    3-5

    5-7

    5-7

    Life appears to be more affected by climate than traffic.

    3.2 State Highways and Interstates California

    Many state highways have been surfaced with slurry surfacing on high traffic roads, and the list below shows some of these that remain at time of writing, and actual life.

    Location Climate Type/Age
    I 99 Lodi Hot summer cool wet winter Type III 10 years still functioning
    I 99 Stockton Hot summer cool wet winter Type III 5 years plus
    I-5 Santa Nella Hot summer cool wet winter Type III 8 years plus
    RT 101 Crescent City Hot summer cold wet winter Type III 14 years
    RT 101 Trinidad Warm summer cold winter Type III 15 years
    I-80 Forrest Hill Hot summer cool wet winter Type III 16 years
    I-5 Redding Above snow line Type III 12 years
    RT 32 Orland Hot summer cool wet winter Type III 15 years
    RT 273 Anderson Hot summer cool wet winter Type III 15 years
    RT 101 Crescent City Cold winter Type III 14 years
    RT 1 Fort Bragg Cold winter Type III 12 years
    RT 44 Redding Above snow line Type III 12 years
    RT 101 Camarillo Very high traffic high humidity Type III 4 years still functioning
    RT 299 Redding Above snow line Type III 10 years
    I-99 Merced Hot summer wet winter Type III 5 years still functioning rut filling
         

    3.3 Interstate I-44

    The following are two typical microsurfacing jobs in Oklahoma carried out by Vance Brothers,. Tim Harrowwood provided the information.

    This was project #IMC-172N (232), project length about 6km. Traffic was 84,000 VPD with 10% trucks. The road is 4 lanes wide in two directions and had multiple exit ramps into Tulsa . Road condition was poor. The objective was to provide a suitable surface for 3-5 years. Work was carried out at night 6pm to 6 am .

    Climate is very hot to very cold with heavy snow in winter.

    Materials used:

    • Aggregate: Flint rock LA abrasion 22, Sand Equivalency 70. From SE Kansas
    • Emulsion: Microsurfacing CSS-1hp
    • Cement: Portland type I
    • Set Control Additive: Surfactant type
    • Local water

    Job Mix:

    • Emulsion 12%
    • Cement 1.75%
    • Water and additive as needed

    Equipment:

    • Continuous run slurry machine
    • Nurse trucks

    Traffic times: 1 hour maximum
    Normal working days ended at 4 am .

    Scope of Work:

    The microsurfacing was placed in two courses. The first pass was a leveling course, and the second was the wearing course.

    Total Surface area was about 120,000 m 2 with about equal amounts per layer placed.

    Grinding was carried out on all pavement markings before the application of microsurfacing. All snow plowable markers were removed. Holes were filled with high performance cold mix.

    3.4 US Highway 64/412

    Project #CMC-172N (238)

    This was carried out around the same time as I-44. This was 5km of a 4-6 lane 26,000 VPD highway. Traffic times and details are similar to the above. The same materials were used. The expected life is 5-7 years.

    4. Conclusions

    The use of slurry surfacing as a maintenance treatment is well established on high traffic roads and the technique can be used in most climatic and traffic conditions. Correct design and applications are essential.

    5. References

    1. International Slurry Surfacing Association (2001) A 413 Recommended Performance Guidelines for Microsurfacing, (2000) Recommended Performance guidelines for Emulsified Asphalt Slurry Seal.
    2. Takamura,K Witlinger,R (2002) “Microsurfacing for preventive Maintenance: eco-efficient strategy“ ISSA workshop Las Vegas
    3. Holleran, G (2001) “Slurry Surfacing“ Pavement maintence seminar Session 4 San Diego
    4. Holleran, G, Hicks R,G, Reed J.R.R(2002)“ Effect OfEmulsion Particle Size and distribution on Slurry and Microsurfacing Applications“ ISSA International Conference Berlin

    Back to VSS Technology Papers Library

    Copyright © 2000 Valley Slurry Seal Co All Rights Reserved.