EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE FOR SIBERIAN ROADS
by Glynn Holleran, Jeffrey R Reed, and Jack Van Kirk

Back to VSS Technology Papers Library


SUMMARY:

Road construction and road performance depends on the materials and construction methods as well as the climate. Low temperatures, poor drainage and weak sub grades plague road builders in many places. The extreme temperature conditions and wet climate of Siberia creates a difficult situation in which to build and maintain roads. Construction and drainage may be sound but with temperatures -20C and below and wet climates water, damage can result leading to soft bases that deflect excessively, causing premature failure by fatigue, frost heave or formation of ice lenses with subsequent disintegration. Low temperature cracking too can be a key cause of pavement failure as it allows water ingress.

Proper maintenance procedures that prevent water ingress, and retard low temperature or reflective cracking can extend pavement life to allow achievement of design life.
This paper discusses methods of pavement maintenance and innovative materials that may be used to extend pavement life even in extreme conditions.


1. INTRODUCTION
Water ingress in a pavement is a primary reason for premature failure. The pavement becoming wet will reduce its stiffness. This occurs for several reasons:
  1. Increased pore pressures that lower internal friction and thus shear resistance
  2. Buoyancy of particles that reduce effective weight and lowers inter particle friction.
  3. Expansive soils cause differential heave.
  4. Frost heave due to freezing and thawing of the pavement.
As pavements are put into tension and compression by wheel loads and water reduces pavement stiffness then load spreading on the Subgrade is reduced. This can lead to fatigue failure of the pavement and rutting in the sub-grade. (1). This may also lead to pumping or loss of fines and formation of potholes. Temperature cycling as in freeze thaw will exacerbate this. Of course other sources of water ingress need to be addressed as well, to waterproof and drain the pavement structure. Others sources of water ingress are:
  1. Ingress via cracks and joints or from unpaved permeable adjoining areas.
  2. Pooling at the sides of a pavement
  3. Excessive runoff from plantations or lawn areas and direct access from the base sides into the base.
  4. Blocked, cracked or broken drainage pipes or water service pipes
  5. Pavements built in trench sections with no drainage outlets.
  6. Lack of slope on pavement causing pooling on the surface.

These are design and drainage issues and must be addressed not only in the design stage but also during pavement life.

Effective treatments must seal and waterproof the surface and prevent water ingress while providing sufficient flexibility and tensile strength to resist thermal cracking due to low temperatures. Such surfaces must also retard reflective cracking. Thus maintenance is as important as construction and design in any program activity.


2. MATERIALS

To resist cracking requires a material that can effectively dissipate strains as they arise. In reflective cracking this will be strains created by stress concentration points at existing cracks in the cracked surface. Thermal cracking is created by thermal stresses. The pavement surface contracts leading to a crack initiation when the tensile strength of the binder is exceeded by the compressive stresses. Hence material must allow high levels of extension without fracture.
To resist fatigue cracking where deflections are high due to softened bases requires the ability to stretch and recover as well as the ability to blunt cracks as they form. It is known (2) that binder content in mixes in thin layers is related to fatigue life and so any binder which has high viscosity and so can be added to mixtures at higher than usual levels, and not cause bleeding, will improve fatigue resistance. If the binder is capable of maintaining these properties over the service temperature range and over time, then it will extend the pavement life significantly.

Polymer modification has been used to extend pavement life (3). However polymer modification is often expensive. Crumb tyre rubber is a better alternative; in binders it is called bitumen (asphalt) rubber. The use of this material to improve the rheological properties of asphalt is long standing and well documented (4-7).

Bitumen (Asphalt) Rubber is made by blending granulated tyre rubber with bitumen and additives. The compatibility of the bitumen with the rubber is a key issue for the performance of the binder in application. It is affected by the grading of the rubber, the time and temperature of mixing and the level of shear in mixing Figure1 shows approximate grading that is ideal, but even rubber buffings up to 2mm may be used if reaction times are longer. (8)


Figure 1 Typical Grading of Crumb Rubber (8)

The compatibility of bitumen / polymer systems may be defined in several ways. It may be in terms of the achievement of a particular morphology, i.e. the structural arrangement of the polymer particles, chains or groups within the bitumen matrix. It may be in terms of thermodynamic stability, i.e. whether the conformation of the polymer particles or chains are in a low energy state, i.e. whether there is a driving force to increase entropy. It may be in terms of practical storage stability, i.e. will it separate on standing. Or it may be based on whether a given property or set of properties are achieved and can be maintained for a suitable period of time (that is until the material has been applied).

A reaction is claimed to occur (6) in which the bitumen and the rubber particle interact to form a gel coated particle (figure 2). This is analogous to the process of swelling that occurs in polymer asphalt systems. (9). This creates a matrix of rubber and bitumen


Figure 2: Interaction between Rubber and Bitumen. (10)


2.1 Properties Of Bitumen (Asphalt) Rubber Binders

The properties of all polymer-modified systems are dependent on the morphology and are optimized when the materials are compatible- that is give finer distributions. (11)- see figure 3. The results of this can also be shown by comparing compatible and incompatible systems using the SHRP PG grading system. Compatible systems have a wider temperature performance range as is shown in table 1.


Figure 3 Morphology with and without extender oil (10)

System PG for Compatible system PG for incompatible systems
60 pen approx base64-1864-18
AR*76-2868-12
SBS 5%76-2268-16
PE 5%76-1664-12
SBR 5%76-2264-16
* Note that AR grading by SHRP is difficult due to large particles and performance will be in fact better in than field than suggested here.
Table 1: Effect on SHRP PG grading (12)

The major effects of using crumb rubber are to increase viscosity and to improve thermal susceptibility. This is shown in Figure 4 and softening and Fraas point as shown in figure 5. This means that the binders are less susceptible to crack under low temperatures or deform under high temperatures.


Figure 4 Thermal Susceptibility Improvements with Rubber (13)


Figure 5 Effect on Softening and Fraas point (13,14)

The binders are able to withstand weathering and aging better too, as shown in figure 6.


TFO=thin film oven, W= Weatherometer
Figure 6 Aging Effects in AR Binders

Properties in membranes and reduction in reflective cracking rely on they ability to reduce stress in the overlay. This is shown in figure 7. In reduction of thermal stress requires an increase in tensile strength and elongation at break. This is shown in figure 8.


Figure 7 Effect of AR on Stress In Overlays (13)



Figure 8 Effect of AR on Tensile Strength and Elongation at Break- Benson Test (14)


2.2 Properties in Seals, Hotmix and Microsurfacing

2.2a Membrane Seals

Seals depend mainly on the binder properties as mentioned above; in SAM seals the requirement of stone retention is added to the requirements. This is shown for Vialit testing at a range of low temperatures in figure 9. AR clearly improved Vialit stone retention compared to non-modified and polymer modified systems.


Figure9 Stone Retention in AR SAM

2.2b Hotmix

In hotmix applications AR can be used as an open graded or gap graded material. It has high fatigue strength compared to standard binders and hence longer life. It may be applied at about 50% of the thickness of a conventional binder mix (4) and maintain fatigue life. Figure 10 shows the increase in fatigue life of mixes when made with AR.


Figure10 Fatigue strength of AR mixes (15)

Low temperature properties too are superior as is shown in the TRST results for various binders in figure 11. It shows that AR significantly improves the low temperature cracking resistance. This is partly die to the improved binder tensile strength but also the 1-2% increase in binder content that is possible in such mixes.


Figure 11 Low temperature Mix properties (14)

High temperature mix properties are similarly enhanced as shown in for wheel tracking at 60C testing. See figure 12. AR has excellent rut resistance.


Figure 12 Deformation Resistance Of AR Mixes (14)

2.2b Microsurfacing

This is used mostly in combination with chip seals as a "Cape" seal two-layer system. This combines the excellent crack resistance of AR with the smooth hardwearing microsurfacing. The use of AR binders is possible with emulsions and can improve the abrasion resistance of microsurfacing significantly as shown in figure wet track abrasion testing. Crumb rubber can either be added as dispersion, (RG-1), as dry into the pugmill via the machine fines feeder, or directly emulsified. (10)


Figure 13 Effect of Abrasion Resistance of Microsurfacing of AR (10)


3.METHODS

The following methods are very successful.

Sound Pavements

  • AR Seals- hot binder
    • Retards low temperature cracking
    • Seals pavement from water
    • Gives high skid resistance
    • Improves stone retention
  • Microsurfacing
    • Gives a good wearing surface and waterproof seal
    • Requires crack treatments first
    • Can be used in combination with AR chip seal
Maintenance on Cracked pavements:
  • AR Seals- hot binder SAM
    • Retards low temperature cracking
    • Seals pavement from water
    • Gives high skid resistance
  • Cape Seal Microsurfacing with AR SAMI
    • Gives a smooth wearing course of low noise
    • No flying stones
    • Also a crack treatment, resists low temperature cracking
  • AR Scrub Seals with Microsurfacing
    • Retards low temperature and reflection cracking
    • Seals pavement from water
    • Gives high skid resistance
  • Open Graded and Gap Graded Rubber Modified Hot mix with SAMI
    • Gives a smooth wearing course of low noise
    • No flying stones
    • Also a crack treatment, resists low temperature cracking

4. CONCLUSION

Asphalt rubber has been used and tested in many countries and regions including USA, Canada, Poland, South America, Australia, Portugal and South Africa, it has been successful in very cold climates (7,14,15) where temperature extremes are as shown in figure 14.

Figure 14 Canadian temperature Cold extremes (7)

AR will improve low temperature and high temperature performance and can be used in membrane seals, hot mix or in combination with other maintenance treatments such as microsurfacing.



5. REFERENCES
  1. Holleran, G , Reed, JRR (2001) " Drainage in Pavements" Construction Materials Association of California Conference Sacramento
  2. Valkering,C.P, Gooswilligen,G (1989) "The Role Of Binder Content In the Performance related Properties of Asphaltic Mixes for Surface Layers" Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists meeting Feb Nashville Vol 59
  3. Holleran, G. Reed JRR, Van Kirk J (2001) "Polymer Modified Asphalt for Economic Pavements" International Road Federation Paris
  4. Van Kirk, J, Holleran, G (2000)" Reduced Thickness leads to Cost Effective Pavement Rehabilitation" Ist International Conference World Of Pavements Australian Asphalt Pavement Association Sydney
  5. Holleran, G , Van Hirk J (1998) "Asphalt Rubber In Chip Seals Slurry, Microsurfacing and Hotmix" Bitumen Asia Conference Singapore
  6. Cano, J, (1997) "Asphalt Rubber" Bitumen Asia Singapore
  7. Pulles, B.C.M, Trelaeavn,LB et al "Asphalt Rubber Trials in Alberta Canada"(2003) Asphalt Rubber 2003 Brasilia
  8. Van Kirk J "Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies Utilizing Asphalt Rubber Chip Seals" Asphalt Rubber 2003 Brasilia
  9. Maccarone,S, Holleran G, Gnanaseelan G " Properties Of Polymer Binders and Relationship to Mix and Relationship to Mix and Pavement Performance" AAPT Vol 64 1995
  10. Holleran, G, Reed JRR (2000) "Emulsification Of Asphalt Rubber Blends" Asphalt Rubber Portugal
  11. Holleran G, Van Kirk J, (1999) "Polymer Modified Asphalt: Compatibility and Performance" International Materials Congress Cancun"
  12. Holleran, G "(2000) " Polymer Modification - Manufacturing and Application" Bitumen Asia Singapore
  13. Van Kirk, J (2004) " Asphalt Rubber Hotmix " The Wet Process" Beijing (Presentation)
  14. Holleran G- Internal Results (1989-2004)
  15. Shatnawi, S Holleran G (2003) " Asphalt rubber Maintenance Treatments in California" Asphalt Rubber 2003 Brasilia

Back to VSS Technology Papers Library

Copyright © 2000 Valley Slurry Seal Co All Rights Reserved.